Vegzelma

Phase 3 Study in NSCLC

Study design & objective1

A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study to compare efficacy and safety of Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin as 1st-line treatment for metastatic or recurrent nsNSCLC.

Overview

*Randomization was stratified by country, sex (female vs. male), disease status (recurrence vs. metastatic), and ECOG PS (0 vs. 1).; † mg·min/mL

Main criteria for inclusion

• Male or female with ≥ 18 years of age
• Metastatic or recurrent nsNSCLC diagnosed according to the AJCC 8th edition on Lung Cancer Staging
• At least 1 measurable lesion by RECIST v1.1

Endpoints

Primary efficacy endpoint Secondary endpoints
ORR during the induction study period ORR during the whole study period, DoR,
TTP, PFS, OS, PK of Ctrough, QoL, Safety profile
Primary efficacy endpoint ORR during the induction study period
Secondary endpoints ORR during the whole study period, DoR,
TTP, PFS, OS, PK of Ctrough, QoL, Safety profile

Study demographics

Overall, demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 treatment groups.

· Baseline demographics and characteristics
of subjects: safety population
Characteristic Vegzelma® (n=342) EU-approved Avastin (n=347) Total (N=689)
Age (years)
Mean (SD) 61.3 (9.01) 61.5 (9.42) 61.4 (9.21)
Median 62.0 62.0 62.0
Minimum, Maximum 32, 82 26, 82 26, 82
Sex, n (%)
Female 119 (34.8) 125 (36.0) 244 (35.4)
Male 223 (65.2) 222 (64.0) 445 (64.6)
Female fertility status*
Surgically sterilized 13 (10.9) 7 (5.6) 20 (8.2)
Post-menopausal 95 (79.8) 104 (83.2) 199 (81.6)
Potentially able to bear children 11 (9.2) 14 (11.2) 25 (10.2)
Race, n (%)
American Indian or Alaska Native 9 (2.6) 9 (2.6) 18 (2.6)
Asian 59 (17.3) 55 (15.9) 114 (16.5)
Black or African American 2 (0.6) 1 (0.3) 3 (0.4)
White or Caucasian 264 (77.2) 264 (76.1) 528 (76.6)
Other 8 (2.3) 18 (5.2) 26 (3.8)
Ethnicity, n (%)
Hispanic or Latino 57 (16.7) 66 (19.0) 123 (17.9)
Non-Hispanic or Non-Latino 282 (82.5) 275 (79.3) 557 (80.8)
Not allowed by investigator
country regulations
0 2 (0.6) 2 (0.3)
Unknown 3 (0.9) 4 (1.2) 7 (1.0)
Smoking history, n (%)
Current smoker 75 (21.9) 88 (25.4) 163 (23.7)
Former smoker 163 (47.7) 148 (42.7) 311 (45.1)
Never smoker 104 (30.4) 111 (32.0) 215 (31.2)
Height (cm)
n 342 346 688
Mean (SD) 166.85 (9.866) 166.53 (10.034) 166.69 (9.945)
Median 167.00 168.00 167.00
Minimum, Maximum 133.0, 194.0 138.0, 194.0 133.0, 194.0
Weight (kg)
n 342 346 688
Mean (SD) 68.76 (15.767) 69.78 (15.283) 69.27 (15.523)
Median 67.00 69.00 68.00
Minimum, Maximum 36.0, 131.0 35.0, 126.0 35.0, 131.0
Disease status, n (%)
Recurrent 25 (7.3) 33 (9.5) 58 (8.4)
Metastatic 317 (92.7) 314 (90.5) 631 (91.6)
Region, n (%)
EMEA 226 (66.1) 230 (66.3) 456 (66.2)
America 59 (17.3) 62 (17.9) 121 (17.6)
Asia 57 (16.7) 55 (15.9) 112 (16.3)
ECOG PS, n (%)
Grade 0 105 (30.7) 110 (31.7) 215 (31.2)
Grade 1 237 (69.3) 237 (68.3) 474 (68.8)

*Fertility status was collected for female patients only. Percentages were calculated by using the number of female patients as the denominator.

Primary efficacy results

The ORRs were similar in the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin treatment groups [42.40% (95% CI: 37.16, 47.64) vs. 42.07% (95% CI: 36.88, 47.27)] and 90% CIs for the risk ratio estimate were within the equivalence margin in ITT population.

· ORR as the primary efficacy endpoint during the
induction study period: ITT population

For BORs, a similar proportion of patients in the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin treatment groups had CR [2 patients (0.6%) and 3 patients (0.9%)
in the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin treatment groups, respectively] and PR [143 patients (41.8%) and 143 patients (41.2%) in the Vegzelma® and
EU-approved Avastin treatment groups, respectively] in the ITT population.

· BOR during the induction
study period : ITT population
Vegzelma® (n=342) EU-approved Avastin (n=347)
Best overall response, n (%)
CR 2 (0.6) 3 (0.9)
PR 143 (41.8) 143 (41.2)
SD 156 (45.6) 140 (40.3)
PD 17 (5.0) 19 (5.5)
Inevaluable 3 (0.9) 3 (0.9)
Missing 21 (6.1) 39 (11.2)

Secondary efficacy results

The secondary objective of the study was to evaluate additional efficacy profiles including DoR, TTP, PFS, and OS of Vegzelma®
compared with EU-approved Avastin. The median DoR* was similar between the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin groups
[7.2 months (95% CI: 6.3, 8.2) vs. 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.8, 7.5)].

· DoR*: ITT population

*DoR: the time between initial response (CR or PR) and PD/recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.

The median TTP† was similar between the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin groups [8.5 months (95% CI: 8.3, 10.0) vs. 8.3 months (95% CI: 7.4, 9.1)].

· TTP: ITT population

TTP: the time from randomization to determined PD/recurrence.

Secondary efficacy results

In the ITT population, 248 (72.5%) patients and 246 (70.9%) patients had died or had PD/recurrence in the Vegzelma® and
EU-approved Avastin treatment groups, respectively.

The median PFS* was similar between the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin groups [7.9 months (95% CI: 6.9, 8.3) vs. 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.5, 8.3)], with the HR† of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.10).

· PFS*: ITT population

*PFS: the time from randomization to determined PD/recurrence or death from any cause, whichever occurred first; †HR: a measure of how often a particular event happens in one
group compared to how often it happens in another group, over time.

In the ITT population, 164 (48.0%) patients and 168 (48.4%) patients had died in the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin treatment groups, respectively.

The median OS‡ was similar between the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin groups [17.1 months (95% CI: 14.6, 18.7) vs. 15.6 months (95% CI: 13.4,
18.0)], with the HR† of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.19).

· OS: ITT population

HR: a measure of how often a particular event happens in one group compared to how often it happens in another group, over time; ‡OS: the time from randomization to death
from any cause.

Pharmacokinetic results

The mean Ctrough at each cycle during the induction and maintenance periods were similar between the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin in the PK population.

Safety profile

Overall, 5,533 TEAEs were reported in 652 (94.6%) patients [332 (96.2%) patients and 320 (93.0%) patients in the Vegzelma® and
EU-approved Avastin treatment groups, respectively].

The majority of TEAEs were grade 1 or 2 in severity and TEAEs with severity of grade 3 or higher was similar between the 2
treatment groups.

· TEAEs during the whole study period: Safety population
TEAE TEAEs grade 3 or higher TESAEs TEAEs leading to study
drug discontinuation
TEAEs leading to death
Vegzelma®
(n=345)
EU-
approved
Avastin
(n=344)
Vegzelma®
(n=345)
EU-
approved
Avastin
(n=344)
Vegzelma®
(n=345)
EU-
approved
Avastin
(n=344)
Vegzelma®
(n=345)
EU-
approved
Avastin
(n=344)
Vegzelma®
(n=345)
EU-
approved
Avastin
(n=344)
Total events 2,957 2,576 313 269 99 95 56 55 23 24
No. of patients (%) 332 (96.2%) 320 (93.0%) 151 (43.8%) 144 (41.9%) 69 (20.0%) 73 (21.2%) 55 (15.9%) 55 (16.0%) 23 (6.7%) 24 (7.0%)
Related to the
study drug
178 (51.6%) 174 (50.6%) 52 (15.1%) 49 (14.2%) 18 (5.2%) 23 (6.7%) 22 (6.4%) 21 (6.1%) 3 (0.9%) 7 (2.0%)
Unrelated to the
study drug
318 (92.2%) 307 (89.2%) 126 (36.5%) 115 (33.4%) 55 (15.9%) 54 (15.7%) 33 (9.6%) 34 (9.9%) 20 (5.8%) 17 (4.9%)

The majority of laboratory parameters had no CTCAE grade or were CTCAE grade 1 (mild) or grade 2 (moderate) for each laboratory parameter.

Immunogenicity results

The majority of patients had negative ADA test results at each time point.

In general, the proportion of patients with positive ADA and NAb results at any time during the study period was similar in the Vegzelma® and EU-approved Avastin treatment groups.

ADA, anti-drug antibodies; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; AUC, area under the curve; BOR, best overall response; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete
response; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; Ctrough, trough serum concentration; DoR, duration of response; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative
Oncology Group performance status; EU, European Union; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent-to-treat; IV, intravenous; NAb, neutralizing antibody; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer;
nsNSCLC, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PD, progressive disease; PFS, progression-free survival;
PK, pharmacokinetic; PR, partial response; Q3W, every 3 weeks; QLQ-C30, Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30; QLQ-LC13, Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung
Cancer-specific module; QoL, quality of life; R, randomization; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors; SD, stable disease; SD, standard deviation;
TEAEs, treatment-emergent adverse events; TESAEs, treatment-emergent serious adverse events; TTP, time to progression.

1. Data on file IV. Celltrion Healthcare.

IMPORTANT
SAFETY
INFORMATION

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS arrow

Gastrointestinal Perforations and Fistulae: Serious, and sometimes fatal, gastrointestinal perforation occurred at a higher incidence in patients receiving bevacizumab products vs chemotherapy. The incidence ranged from 0.3% to 3% across clinical studies, with the highest incidence in patients with a history of prior pelvic radiation. Serious fistulae ranged from < 1% to 1.8% across clinical studies, with the highest incidence in patients with cervical cancer. Avoid VEGZELMA in patients with ovarian cancer who have evidence of recto-sigmoid involvement by pelvic examination or bowel involvement on CT scan or clinical symptoms of bowel obstruction. Discontinue in patients who develop gastrointestinal perforation, tracheoesophageal fistula, or any Grade 4 fistula. Discontinue in patients with fistula formation involving any internal organ


Surgery and Wound Healing Complications: The incidence of surgery and wound healing complications, including serious and fatal complications, was increased in patients receiving bevacizumab products. In patients who experience wound healing complications during treatment, withhold VEGZELMA until adequate wound healing. Discontinue VEGZELMA in patients who develop necrotizing fasciitis.


Hemorrhage: Severe or fatal hemorrhage occurred up to 5-fold more frequently in patients receiving bevacizumab products vs chemotherapy alone. Discontinue VEGZELMA in patients who develop a Grades 3-4 hemorrhage.


Arterial Thromboembolic Events: Serious, sometimes fatal, arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) occurred at a higher incidence in patients receiving bevacizumab vs chemotherapy. Discontinue VEGZELMA in patients who develop a severe ATE. The safety of reinitiating bevacizumab products after an ATE is resolved is not known.


Venous Thromboembolic Events: An increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) was observed across clinical studies. Discontinue VEGZELMA in patients with a Grade 4 VTE, including pulmonary embolism.


Hypertension: Severe hypertension occurred at a higher incidence in patients receiving bevacizumab products vs chemotherapy alone. Monitor blood pressure every two to three weeks during treatment with VEGZELMA. Treat with appropriate anti-hypertensive therapy and monitor blood pressure regularly. Discontinue in patients who develop hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy.


Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) was reported in < 0.5% of patients across clinical studies. Discontinue VEGZELMA in patients who develop PRES.


Renal Injury and Proteinuria: The incidence and severity of proteinuria was higher in patients receiving bevacizumab products vs chemotherapy. Nephrotic syndrome occurred in < 1% of patients receiving bevacizumab products across clinical studies, in some instances with fatal outcome. Discontinue VEGZELMA in patients who develop nephrotic syndrome


Infusion-Related Reactions: In clinical studies, infusion-related reactions with the first dose of bevacizumab products occurred in < 3% of patients and severe reactions occurred in 0.4% of patients. Decrease the rate of infusion for mild, clinically insignificant infusion-related reactions. Interrupt the infusion in patients with clinically significant infusion-related reactions and consider resuming at a slower rate following resolution. Discontinue VEGZELMA in patients who develop a severe infusion-related reaction and administer appropriate medical therapy.


Embryo-Fetal Toxicity: Bevacizumab products may cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with VEGZELMA and for 6 months after the last dose.


Ovarian Failure: The incidence of ovarian failure was 34% vs 2% in premenopausal women receiving bevacizumab with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for adjuvant treatment of a solid tumor. Inform females of reproductive potential of the risk of ovarian failure prior to initiating treatment with VEGZELMA.


Congestive Heart Failure (CHF): VEGZELMA is not indicated for use with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Discontinue VEGZELMA in patients who develop CHF.


MOST COMMON ADVERSE REACTIONS

The most common adverse reactions observed in patients receiving bevacizumab products as a single agent or in combination with other anti-cancer therapies at a rate >10% were epistaxis, headache, hypertension, rhinitis, proteinuria, taste alteration, dry skin, hemorrhage, lacrimation disorder, back pain, and exfoliative dermatitis.


Across clinical studies, bevacizumab was discontinued in 8% to 22% of patients because of adverse reactions.


ADVERSE REACTIONS BY INDICATION
Metastatic colorectal cancer, in combination with intravenous fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for first- or second-line treatment
  • Study AVF2107g: Grades 3-4 adverse reactions occurring at higher incidence (≥2%) in patients receiving bevacizumab with IFL (N=392) vs placebo with IFL (N=396) were leukopenia (37% vs 31%), neutropenia (21% vs 14%), diarrhea (34% vs 25%), abdominal pain (8% vs 5%), constipation (4% vs 2%), hypertension (12% vs 2%), deep vein thrombosis (9% vs 5%), intra-abdominal thrombosis (3% vs 1%), syncope (3% vs 1%), asthenia (10% vs 7%), and pain (8% vs 5%)

Metastatic colorectal cancer, in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan- or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for second-line treatment in patients who have progressed on a first-line bevacizumab product-containing regimen
  • Study E3200: Selected Grades 3-5 (non-hematologic) and Grades 4-5 (hematologic) reactions occurring at a higher incidence (≥2%) in patients receiving bevacizumab with FOLFOX4 (N=521) vs FOLFOX4 alone were fatigue (19% vs 13%), diarrhea (18% vs 13%), sensory neuropathy (17% vs 9%), nausea (12% vs 5%), vomiting (11% vs 4%), dehydration (10% vs 5%), hypertension (9% vs 2%), abdominal pain (8% vs 5%), hemorrhage (5% vs 1%), other neurological (5% vs 3%), ileus (4% vs 1%), and headache (3% vs 0%)

Unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel for first-line treatment
  • Study E4599: Grades 3-5 (non-hematologic) and Grades 4-5 (hematologic) adverse reactions occurring at a higher incidence (≥2%) in patients receiving bevacizumab with paclitaxel and carboplatin (N=422) vs chemotherapy alone were neutropenia (27% vs 17%), fatigue (16% vs 13%), hypertension (8% vs 0.7%), infection without neutropenia (7% vs 3%), venous thromboembolism (5% vs 3%), febrile neutropenia (5% vs 2%), pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltrates (5% vs 3%), infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (4% vs 2%), hyponatremia (4% vs 1%), headache (3% vs 1%), and proteinuria (3% vs 0%)

Recurrent glioblastoma in adults
  • Study EORTC 26101: In the bevacizumab with lomustine arm (N=278), 22% of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse reactions vs 10% of patients in the lomustine arm. In patients receiving bevacizumab with lomustine, the adverse reaction profile was similar to that observed in other approved indications

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma in combination with interferon alfa
  • Study BO17705: Grades 3-5 adverse reactions occurring at a higher incidence (>2%) in patients receiving bevacizumab with interferon alfa (N=337) vs placebo with interferon alfa (N=304) were fatigue (13% vs 8%), asthenia (10% vs 7%), proteinuria (7% vs 0%), hypertension (6% vs 1%; including hypertension and hypertensive crisis), and hemorrhage (3% vs 0.3%; including epistaxis, small intestinal hemorrhage, aneurysm ruptured, gastric ulcer hemorrhage, gingival bleeding, hemoptysis, hemorrhage intracranial, large intestinal hemorrhage, respiratory tract hemorrhage, and traumatic hematoma)

Persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer, in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin, or paclitaxel and topotecan
  • Study GOG-0240: Grades 3-4 adverse reactions occurring at a higher incidence (≥2%) in patients receiving bevacizumab with chemotherapy (N=218) vs chemotherapy alone (N=222) were abdominal pain (12% vs 10%), hypertension (11% vs 0.5%), thrombosis (8% vs 3%), diarrhea (6% vs 3%), anal fistula (4% vs 0%), proctalgia (3% vs 0%), urinary tract infection (8% vs 6%), cellulitis (3% vs 0.5%), fatigue (14% vs 10%), hypokalemia (7% vs 4%), hyponatremia (4% vs 1%), dehydration (4% vs 0.5%), neutropenia (8% vs 4%), lymphopenia (6% vs 3%), back pain (6% vs 3%), and pelvic pain (6% vs 1%)

Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by VEGZELMA as a single agent, for stage III or IV disease following initial surgical resection
  • Study BO17705: Grades 3-4 adverse reactions occurring at a higher incidence (≥2%) in either of the bevacizumab arms (N=608, N=607) vs control arm (N=602) were fatigue (CPB15+ - 9%, CPB15 - 6%, CPP - 6%), hypertension (CPB15+ - 10%, CPB15 - 6%, CPP - 2%), thrombocytopenia (CPB15+ - 21%, CPB15 - 20%, CPP - 15%), and leukopenia (CPB15+ - 51%, CPB15 - 53%, CPP - 50%)

Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer in combination with paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan for platinum-resistant recurrent disease who received no more than 2 prior chemotherapy regimens
  • Study MO22224: Grades 3-4 adverse reactions occurring at a higher incidence (≥2%) in patients receiving bevacizumab with chemotherapy (N=179) vs chemotherapy alone (N=181) were hypertension (6.7% vs 1.1%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (4.5% vs 1.7%)

Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel or carboplatin and gemcitabine, followed by VEGZELMA as a single agent, for platinum-sensitive recurrent disease
  • Study AVF4095g: Grades 3-4 adverse reactions occurring at a higher incidence (≥2%) in patients receiving bevacizumab with chemotherapy (N=247) vs placebo with chemotherapy (N=233) were thrombocytopenia (40% vs 34%), nausea (4% vs 1.3%), fatigue (6% vs 4%), headache (4% vs 0.9%), proteinuria (10% vs 0.4%), dyspnea (4% vs 1.7%), epistaxis (5% vs 0.4%), and hypertension (17% vs 0.9%)

You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088. Please see full Prescribing Information for complete information.


1. Vegzelma US Prescribing Information (2022)
This site is intended for US audiences only. Models are used for illustrative purposes only. Not actual patients.
Vegzelma® is a registered trademark of Celltrion, Inc., used under license.
ⓒ Celltrion USA, Inc. 2023 VEG-2306-2405-WS001

Cookie technology helps us to provide you with the best possible experience when you visit this website. If you continue without changing your settings, you agree to the cookies on this website. For more information about our Cookie policy, please see the link to our Privacy Policy at the bottom of the page.